City Survivability Rankings for Russian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Russian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Russian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Russian Restaurant is Portland — 89% average survivability
- 24 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Russian Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 84%
- National average survivability score for Russian Restaurant: 86.6%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Russian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Best Neighborhoods Across the Spectrum
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Russian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Russian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Russian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Portland ranks as the #1 city for opening a Russian Restaurant in the United States, with an average 89% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are San Antonio with 89%, and St Louis with 89%. Our 24-city dataset shows Russian Restaurants achieving 86.6% average survivability nationally — Portland pulling notably ahead of the pack. These averages mask significant neighborhood-by-neighborhood variation; a lower-ranked city can still contain high-potential storefronts. Use this data to narrow your shortlist, then visit each top city in person to assess foot traffic and competitive density.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Russian Restaurant city survivability rankings — Portland leads among 24 US metros at 89% in 2026
All 24 Cities Ranked for Russian Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Russian Restaurants:
1. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 92.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.5% – 90.0%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 80.3%
Why the same business does so differently city to city
2. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 92.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.2% – 89.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 79.9%
3. St Louis
- Best locations: 92.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.0% – 89.5%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 79.7%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 92.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.3% – 89.0%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.9%
5. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 92.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.6% – 89.0%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 79.5%
6. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 91.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.9% – 88.5%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.8%
7. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.3% – 88.4%
- Challenging locations: 63.0% – 80.0%
8. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.9% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 79.0%
9. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 91.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.9% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 79.2%
- Explore Russian Restaurant neighborhoods in Atlanta →
10. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 91.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.7% – 88.1%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 79.1%
11. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 91.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 88.0%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.8%
12. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 91.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 87.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.3%
The metro-level signals behind these scores
13. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.4% – 87.7%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.8%
14. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.0% – 87.6%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.9%
15. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 91.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.5%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 77.2%
16. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.7% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.6%
17. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.8% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.9%
18. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 87.3%
- Challenging locations: 63.0% – 79.1%
19. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.1%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.8%
20. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.4% – 87.1%
- Challenging locations: 66.0% – 79.8%
21. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.3% – 86.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.5%
22. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.4% – 86.7%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.0%
23. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 86.2%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.7%
24. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 89.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.1% – 85.6%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 76.6%
Patterns Across the National Picture
| Comparison factor | Top-tier city pattern | Bottom-tier city pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Daytime vs residential population mix | Cities with strong daytime employment density near the storefront catchment — CBD-adjacent mixed-use corridors. | Bedroom-community metros where daytime population evaporates by 9am and consumption shifts to 6pm dinner-only windows. |
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
| Anchor-tenant density | Cities with high concentration of universities, hospitals, transit hubs within a 1-mile radius of typical storefronts. | Cities where anchor institutions are isolated in suburbs or single-purpose campuses with no street-level spillover. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Portland at 89.0%) and the #24 city (New York City at 84.1%) is 4.9 percentage points. This 0.2-point spread between #1 and #2 city suggests meaningful geographic variation in Russian Restaurants viability — city selection matters significantly for this category.
What changed since last year's ranking
Strong performers: 24 cities show Survivability Scores above 80%, indicating highly favorable conditions for Russian Restaurants.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Russian Restaurant is 86.6%.
What the Leaders Share
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Russian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Portland leads with a 89% average survivability score for Russian Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Russian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Economic conditions: All top-ranked cities show strong median household incomes and low vacancy rates in the neighborhoods where Russian Restaurants perform best.
- Low market saturation: Top cities for Russian Restaurants have fewer direct competitors per square mile than lower-ranked metros, leaving meaningful whitespace for well-positioned new entrants.
Powered by advanced AI, StreetSpring predicts how businesses will perform in neighborhoods across the country. StreetSpring measures competition through a 30-factor framework. StreetSpring's predictions leverage proprietary datasets covering competition, spending, and mobility.
Neighborhood-Level Winners in Every Tier
National rankings tell only part of the story. Even cities further down the list contain neighborhoods where Russian Restaurants thrive. A few examples:
Portland — ranked #1 nationally — the strongest market for Russian Restaurants
- Ogden (87% survivability)
- Kenton (87% survivability)
- Multnomah (86% survivability)
- Hough (86% survivability)
- Markham (85% survivability)
See full neighborhood rankings for Portland →
Minneapolis — ranked #13 of 24 — a middle-of-the-pack national market
- Morris-Park (86% survivability)
- Logan-Park (84% survivability)
- Como (83% survivability)
- St-Paul (83% survivability)
- Summit-Hill (83% survivability)
See full neighborhood rankings for Minneapolis →
New York City — ranked #24 of 24 — among the lower-ranked national markets
- Rockaway-Park (88% survivability)
- Eltingville (87% survivability)
- Coney-Island (87% survivability)
- Newark (86% survivability)
- Brighton-Beach (86% survivability)
See full neighborhood rankings for New York City →
These examples show that a city's national rank for Russian Restaurants is a starting signal — neighborhood-level data is what drives an actual location decision.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Same business type in other cities:
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
When does StreetSpring refresh the city rankings?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Russian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Do Russian Restaurants only work in top-10 cities?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Russian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Russian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
Which tools rank cities for a Russian Restaurant survivability?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Russian Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Russian Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Russian Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which metro tops the Russian Restaurant survivability ranking?
Portland ranks as the #1 city in the US for Russian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 89%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Portland, a Russian Restaurant has approximately a 89% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. San Antonio ranks second, followed by St Louis. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: May 10, 2026 by Bobby Koons, StreetSpring founder — updated weekly
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and foot traffic data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Portland, San Antonio, St Louis, Charlotte, Orlando, Phoenix, Baltimore, Detroit, Atlanta, San Diego, Tampa Bay, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Houston, Los Angeles, Denver, Seattle, Miami, Chicago, Dallas, Washington DC, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City.