City Survivability Rankings for Southeast Asian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Southeast Asian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Southeast Asian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Southeast Asian Restaurant is Portland — 87% average survivability
- 24 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Southeast Asian Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 82%
- National average survivability score for Southeast Asian Restaurant: 84.7%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Southeast Asian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Southeast Asian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Southeast Asian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Southeast Asian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Portland ranks as the #1 city for opening a Southeast Asian Restaurant in the United States, with an average 87% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are San Antonio with 87%, and St Louis with 87%. The 24-city analysis shows Southeast Asian Restaurants performing at a 84.7% national average, with strong geographic concentration of top scores in a handful of metros. Even cities with modest average scores can harbor exceptional individual locations — always check the address-level data. Use this data to narrow your shortlist, then visit each top city in person to assess foot traffic and competitive density.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Southeast Asian Restaurant city survivability rankings — Portland leads among 24 US metros at 87% in 2026
Every Major US Metro Ranked for Southeast Asian Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Southeast Asian Restaurants:
1. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.8% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.7%
Why the same business does so differently city to city
2. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.6% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.4%
3. St Louis
- Best locations: 91.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.3% – 88.0%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.1%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 91.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.8% – 87.5%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.7%
5. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.9% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.0%
6. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.4% – 87.2%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.2%
7. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.8% – 86.7%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 76.5%
8. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 90.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.3% – 86.6%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 77.9%
9. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 86.3%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.5%
10. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.6% – 86.3%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.8%
11. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 90.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.4% – 86.0%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.6%
12. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.9% – 86.0%
- Challenging locations: 54.0% – 75.4%
Where mid-ranked cities still beat top-ranked spots locally
13. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.3% – 86.0%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.5%
14. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.2% – 86.0%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.2%
15. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 90.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 85.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 77.3%
16. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 89.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.7% – 85.5%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.8%
17. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 89.3% – 96.0%
- Average locations: 81.3% – 85.3%
- Challenging locations: 63.0% – 77.6%
18. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 89.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.6% – 85.4%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.8%
19. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 89.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.4% – 85.3%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 75.4%
20. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 89.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.4% – 85.2%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.6%
21. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 89.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.1% – 85.0%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 75.2%
22. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 89.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.0% – 84.8%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.3%
23. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 89.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 79.3% – 84.2%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 74.5%
24. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 89.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 79.4% – 84.2%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 74.8%
Key Insights
| Comparison factor | Top-tier city pattern | Bottom-tier city pattern |
|---|---|---|
| BLS QCEW retail employment trend | Cities with positive 3-year retail employment growth — proxy for local demand expansion. | Cities showing flat or declining retail employment over the same window. |
| Anchor-tenant density | Cities with high concentration of universities, hospitals, transit hubs within a 1-mile radius of typical storefronts. | Cities where anchor institutions are isolated in suburbs or single-purpose campuses with no street-level spillover. |
| Market size vs saturation | Mid-sized metros with established demand but room for new entrants — under-served pockets in 1.5M–5M population markets. | Either tier-1 cities saturated with national chains, or thin markets under 500K population where demand can't sustain a category. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Portland at 87.2%) and the #24 city (New York City at 82.4%) is 4.7 percentage points. The 0.0-point lead Portland holds over San Antonio reflects real structural differences in how well each metro supports Southeast Asian Restaurants — not just random variation.
Three findings worth pulling out of the data
Strong performers: 24 cities show Survivability Scores above 80%, indicating highly favorable conditions for Southeast Asian Restaurants.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Southeast Asian Restaurant is 84.7%.
What the Leaders Share
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Southeast Asian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Portland leads with a 87% average survivability score for Southeast Asian Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Southeast Asian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Foot traffic infrastructure: High-scoring cities combine transit access, walkable commercial corridors, and anchor tenants that drive consistent daily traffic past storefronts.
- Geographic distribution: The top cities span multiple U.S. regions, giving franchise operators or multi-location owners diverse market options without concentrating risk.
Powered by advanced AI, StreetSpring predicts how businesses will perform in neighborhoods across the country. Our models are built using machine learning trained on millions of commercial real estate data points. Our proprietary models incorporate data sources not available through any public platform.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for Argentinian Restaurant
How fresh is this city-survivability data?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Southeast Asian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Do Southeast Asian Restaurants only work in top-10 cities?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Southeast Asian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Southeast Asian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
Which resources help pick the right metro for a Southeast Asian Restaurant?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Southeast Asian Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Southeast Asian Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Southeast Asian Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which city ranks first for Southeast Asian Restaurants?
Portland ranks as the #1 city in the US for Southeast Asian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 87%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Portland, a Southeast Asian Restaurant has approximately a 87% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. San Antonio ranks second, followed by St Louis. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: April 24, 2026 by Bobby Koons, StreetSpring founder — updated weekly
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and walkability data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Portland, San Antonio, St Louis, Charlotte, Orlando, Phoenix, Tampa Bay, Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Houston, Miami, Minneapolis, Dallas, Denver, Washington DC, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City.