City Survivability Rankings for South Asian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for South Asian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a South Asian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for South Asian Restaurant is San Antonio — 87% average survivability
- 24 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for South Asian Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 82%
- National average survivability score for South Asian Restaurant: 84.6%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for South Asian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a South Asian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a South Asian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for South Asian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, San Antonio ranks as the #1 city for opening a South Asian Restaurant in the United States, with an average 87% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are Portland with 87%, and St Louis with 87%. Across 24 major US metros, South Asian Restaurants show a national average survivability of 84.6%, with 24 cities scoring above 80%. Location-level factors like visibility, foot traffic, and adjacent tenants can override city-level trends in either direction. Market conditions shift frequently — use StreetSpring's live tool to confirm the current picture before committing to a location.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
South Asian Restaurant city survivability rankings — San Antonio leads among 24 US metros at 87% in 2026
Ranked: 24 Cities by South Asian Restaurant Survivability
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for South Asian Restaurants:
1. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.5% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 78.1%
Where the top 5 cluster, and the surprising outliers
2. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.7% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.7%
3. St Louis
- Best locations: 91.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.3% – 88.0%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.1%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.8% – 87.5%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.7%
5. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.9% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.0%
6. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.4% – 87.2%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.2%
7. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 90.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.7% – 86.7%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 76.5%
8. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 90.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.3% – 86.6%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 77.9%
9. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 86.3%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.5%
10. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.6% – 86.2%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.7%
11. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.8% – 85.9%
- Challenging locations: 54.0% – 75.3%
12. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.1% – 85.9%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.2%
Reading the gap from #1 to the median city
13. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.1% – 85.9%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.2%
14. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.2% – 85.9%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.5%
15. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 90.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 85.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 77.3%
16. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 89.3% – 96.0%
- Average locations: 81.4% – 85.3%
- Challenging locations: 63.0% – 77.6%
17. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 89.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.6% – 85.4%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.8%
18. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 89.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.5% – 85.3%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.7%
19. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 89.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.2% – 85.2%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 75.3%
20. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 89.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.0% – 85.0%
- Challenging locations: 55.0% – 74.9%
21. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 89.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.1% – 85.0%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 75.1%
22. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 89.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.1% – 84.7%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 75.5%
23. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 89.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 79.3% – 84.2%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 74.5%
24. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 89.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 79.2% – 84.1%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 74.5%
What Stands Out in the Numbers
| Signal | Where strong-survivability cities outperform | What drags weaker cities down |
|---|---|---|
| Daytime vs residential population mix | Cities with strong daytime employment density near the storefront catchment — CBD-adjacent mixed-use corridors. | Bedroom-community metros where daytime population evaporates by 9am and consumption shifts to 6pm dinner-only windows. |
| Climate-driven seasonality | Cities where the subtype's peak season aligns with the local climate calendar (e.g., year-round outdoor dining in mild markets). | Cities with extreme seasonality that compresses revenue into 4–6 month windows. |
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (San Antonio at 87.1%) and the #24 city (New York City at 82.4%) is 4.8 percentage points. This 0.0-point variation between the #1 and #2 cities is below average for the category, suggesting that South Asian Restaurants are particularly responsive to local market conditions.
How to read these insights against your own market
Strong performers: 24 cities show Survivability Scores above 80%, indicating highly favorable conditions for South Asian Restaurants.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a South Asian Restaurant is 84.6%.
What's Driving the Strongest Markets
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor South Asian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: San Antonio leads with a 87% average survivability score for South Asian Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for South Asian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Neighborhood diversity: Within each top city, high-survivability zones appear across multiple neighborhood types — from dense urban cores to established suburban strips.
- Low market saturation: Top cities for South Asian Restaurants have fewer direct competitors per square mile than lower-ranked metros, leaving meaningful whitespace for well-positioned new entrants.
Our survivability predictions are built on one of the largest commercial real estate datasets available, covering 24 major metros. Our platform has analyzed hundreds of thousands of business outcomes across major U.S. metros. StreetSpring uses its own proprietary forecasting tools to make these predictions.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for Argentinian Restaurant
When was this ranking last refreshed?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for South Asian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Should a South Asian Restaurant avoid cities ranked below the top 10?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open South Asian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. South Asian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
What's the best way to evaluate cities for a South Asian Restaurant?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for South Asian Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for South Asian Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a South Asian Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
What is the #1 city for South Asian Restaurants?
San Antonio ranks as the #1 city in the US for South Asian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 87%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in San Antonio, a South Asian Restaurant has approximately a 87% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. Portland ranks second, followed by St Louis. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed by Bobby Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring — May 9, 2026
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and walkability data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: San Antonio, Portland, St Louis, Charlotte, Orlando, Phoenix, Tampa Bay, Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit, Los Angeles, San Diego, Houston, San Francisco, Miami, Dallas, Minneapolis, Denver, Washington DC, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City.