City Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Italian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for an Italian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- Survivability Score: the projected chance a business type lasts two or more years at a specific address
- The highest-ranked city for Italian Restaurant is Charlotte: 83.1% at a good address, 73.3% at a typical address
- Dallas and San Antonio are left out of this ranking while a gap in their input data is repaired
- 7 of 22 analyzed US metros average above 70% for Italian Restaurant survivability at a typical address
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 76.3%
- National average chance of lasting two or more years for Italian Restaurant: 67.4%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 22 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Italian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can an Italian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for an Italian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Italian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Charlotte ranks as the #1 city for opening an Italian Restaurant in the United States, with an 83.1% chance of lasting two or more years at a good address. Following close behind are Atlanta with 83.1%, and Denver with 83.1%. The national picture for Italian Restaurants shows 67.4% average survivability across 22 cities, with the gap between Charlotte and lower-ranked metros revealing significant geographic variation. These averages mask significant neighborhood-by-neighborhood variation; a lower-ranked city can still contain high-potential storefronts. Use this data to narrow your shortlist, then visit each top city in person to assess foot traffic and competitive density.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Best-to-worst Italian Restaurant survivability within individual metros: Charlotte, Atlanta, Detroit, Boston and New York City. Each box spans the middle of that metro's range; whiskers are its best and worst locations (2026).
All 22 Cities Ranked for Italian Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 22 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Italian Restaurants:
| # | Metro | Metro area | Chance of lasting two or more years at a good address |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlotte | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC | 83.1% |
| 2 | Atlanta | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 83.1% |
| 3 | Denver | Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 83.1% |
| 4 | Orlando | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL | 82.7% |
| 5 | Houston | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 82.7% |
| 6 | Seattle | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 82.7% |
| 7 | Chicago | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 82.7% |
| 8 | Minneapolis | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 81.8% |
| 9 | St. Louis | St. Louis, MO-IL | 81.8% |
| 10 | Washington DC | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 81.3% |
| 11 | Los Angeles | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 81.3% |
| 12 | Detroit | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 80.4% |
| 13 | Baltimore | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 80.4% |
| 14 | Miami | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 80.4% |
| 15 | Philadelphia | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 80.0% |
| 16 | San Diego | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | 80.0% |
| 17 | Phoenix | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 80.0% |
| 18 | San Francisco | San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 80.0% |
| 19 | Portland | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 79.5% |
| 20 | Tampa Bay | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | 79.0% |
| 21 | Boston | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 78.2% |
| 22 | New York City | New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 76.3% |
1. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- At a good address: 83.1%
- At a typical address: 73.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Charlotte →
2. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- At a good address: 83.1%
- At a typical address: 72.5%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Atlanta →
3. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- At a good address: 83.1%
- At a typical address: 71.6%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Denver →
4. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 71.8%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Orlando →
5. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 71.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Houston →
6. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 70.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Seattle →
7. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 65.6%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Chicago →
8. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 70.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Minneapolis →
9. St. Louis Metro: St. Louis, MO-IL
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 69.6%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in St. Louis →
10. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- At a good address: 81.3%
- At a typical address: 66.4%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Washington DC →
11. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- At a good address: 81.3%
- At a typical address: 65.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Los Angeles →
12. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- At a good address: 80.4%
- At a typical address: 68.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Detroit →
13. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- At a good address: 80.4%
- At a typical address: 67.0%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Baltimore →
14. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- At a good address: 80.4%
- At a typical address: 64.5%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Miami →
15. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 66.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Philadelphia →
16. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 66.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in San Diego →
17. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 65.8%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Phoenix →
18. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 63.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in San Francisco →
19. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- At a good address: 79.5%
- At a typical address: 64.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Portland →
20. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- At a good address: 79.0%
- At a typical address: 64.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Tampa Bay →
21. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- At a good address: 78.2%
- At a typical address: 63.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in Boston →
22. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- At a good address: 76.3%
- At a typical address: 60.7%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Italian Restaurant neighborhoods in New York City →
Key Insights
Moderate variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Charlotte at 83.1%) and the #22 city (New York City at 76.3%) is 6.80 percentage points. Less than a percentage point separates Charlotte from Atlanta. For Italian Restaurants, that is small next to the spread between the best and worst addresses in either city.
National average: Across all 22 analyzed cities, the average survivability for an Italian Restaurant is 67.4%.
What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Italian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Charlotte leads with a 73% average chance of lasting two or more years for Italian Restaurants: significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Italian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Neighborhood diversity: Within each top city, high-survivability zones appear across multiple neighborhood types, from dense urban cores to established suburban strips.
- Geographic distribution: The top cities span multiple U.S. regions, giving franchise operators or multi-location owners diverse market options without concentrating risk.
Our AI platform forecasts business outcomes at the address level, giving entrepreneurs and landlords alike a data-driven edge. We apply advanced machine learning to massive commercial real estate datasets to build accurate models. These forecasts are generated by our exclusive analytical framework, built from the ground up for commercial real estate.
Related Resources
City-specific guides: For detailed neighborhood-level analysis, explore our city guides:
- Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant in Charlotte
- Business Survivability Rankings: Charlotte
- Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant in Atlanta
- Business Survivability Rankings: Atlanta
- Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant in Denver
- Business Survivability Rankings: Denver
- Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant in Orlando
- Business Survivability Rankings: Orlando
- Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurant in Houston
- Business Survivability Rankings: Houston
National guides:
- National Neighborhood Survivability Rankings for Italian Restaurants
- Neighborhood Survivability Rankings: Charlotte
How current is this ranking?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates: particularly for Italian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Can an Italian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
Yes, our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Italian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Italian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align, even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
What tools can help me choose the right city for an Italian Restaurant?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Italian Restaurants across all 22 metros we track. For this category specifically, the model reads competition density, the consumer spending index for Italian Restaurants, and Census neighborhood characteristics such as the housing vacancy rate, and turns them into the projected chance that an Italian Restaurant lasts two or more years at a given address. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which US city has the best survivability for Italian Restaurants?
Charlotte ranks as the #1 city in the US for Italian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average 73% chance of lasting two or more years. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Charlotte, an Italian Restaurant has approximately a 73% chance of still operating after two years, above the national average for this category. Atlanta ranks second, followed by Denver. The full ranking reflects data across 22 major US metro areas: see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: October 2026 by Robert Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and walkability data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: Each metro's figures pool the scored locations in its published neighborhoods. Metros are ranked the way the national data file ranks them, on the chance of lasting two or more years at a good address; the typical-address figure is shown alongside. Coverage includes 22 major US metropolitan areas: Charlotte, Atlanta, Denver, Orlando, Houston, Seattle, Chicago, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Detroit, Baltimore, Miami, Philadelphia, San Diego, Phoenix, San Francisco, Portland, Tampa Bay, Boston, New York City. StreetSpring scores 500+ business types: 153 base business types, most of them at 5 price points, which is 569 type-and-price combinations you can choose in the tool.