City Survivability Rankings for Seafood Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Seafood Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Seafood Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Seafood Restaurant is Miami — 74% average survivability
- 15 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Seafood Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is Minneapolis at 68%
- National average survivability score for Seafood Restaurant: 70.3%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Seafood Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Seafood Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Seafood Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Seafood Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Miami ranks as the #1 city for opening a Seafood Restaurant in the United States, with an average 74% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are Dallas with 74%, and Tampa Bay with 72%. StreetSpring's 24-city analysis places the national average for Seafood Restaurants at 70.3%, a baseline that Miami comfortably exceeds. Our data shows that strong individual locations exist in every city we analyze, regardless of the city's overall ranking. Pair these survivability scores with StreetSpring's live tool to get a real-time view before making a final decision.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Seafood Restaurant city survivability rankings — Miami leads among 24 US metros at 74% in 2026
All 24 Cities Ranked for Seafood Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Seafood Restaurants:
1. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 83.1% – 94.0%
- Average locations: 71.0% – 76.6%
- Challenging locations: 47.0% – 66.1%
Why the same business does so differently city to city
2. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 82.5% – 93.0%
- Average locations: 70.4% – 76.2%
- Challenging locations: 45.0% – 65.2%
3. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 81.0% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 68.5% – 74.5%
- Challenging locations: 42.0% – 63.0%
4. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 81.2% – 93.0%
- Average locations: 67.9% – 74.2%
- Challenging locations: 41.0% – 62.4%
5. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 80.5% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 68.2% – 73.6%
- Challenging locations: 47.0% – 63.8%
6. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 80.0% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 67.7% – 73.4%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 62.6%
7. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 79.9% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 67.4% – 73.2%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 62.4%
8. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 80.3% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 67.3% – 73.2%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 62.4%
9. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 79.8% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 67.8% – 73.0%
- Challenging locations: 47.0% – 63.5%
10. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 79.7% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 67.0% – 72.9%
- Challenging locations: 42.0% – 61.9%
11. St Louis
- Best locations: 80.1% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 66.9% – 72.9%
- Challenging locations: 42.0% – 61.8%
12. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 79.6% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 67.1% – 72.8%
- Challenging locations: 44.0% – 62.4%
Reading the gap from #1 to the median city
13. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 81.4% – 95.0%
- Average locations: 66.5% – 73.2%
- Challenging locations: 39.0% – 60.9%
14. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 79.5% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 66.8% – 72.6%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 62.0%
15. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 79.0% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 66.8% – 72.4%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 61.9%
16. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 79.8% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 66.2% – 72.5%
- Challenging locations: 40.0% – 60.9%
17. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 80.2% – 93.0%
- Average locations: 66.3% – 72.5%
- Challenging locations: 41.0% – 61.1%
18. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 79.3% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 65.3% – 71.8%
- Challenging locations: 38.0% – 59.7%
19. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 79.3% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 65.6% – 71.6%
- Challenging locations: 42.0% – 60.8%
- Explore Seafood Restaurant neighborhoods in Atlanta →
20. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 79.7% – 93.0%
- Average locations: 65.1% – 71.7%
- Challenging locations: 38.0% – 59.6%
21. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 79.7% – 93.0%
- Average locations: 65.7% – 71.7%
- Challenging locations: 43.0% – 61.1%
22. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 79.1% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 65.3% – 71.4%
- Challenging locations: 41.0% – 60.3%
23. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 79.1% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 65.2% – 71.3%
- Challenging locations: 41.0% – 60.2%
24. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 78.6% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 65.1% – 71.1%
- Challenging locations: 41.0% – 60.2%
Key Insights
| Signal | Where strong-survivability cities outperform | What drags weaker cities down |
|---|---|---|
| Climate-driven seasonality | Cities where the subtype's peak season aligns with the local climate calendar (e.g., year-round outdoor dining in mild markets). | Cities with extreme seasonality that compresses revenue into 4–6 month windows. |
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
| Daytime vs residential population mix | Cities with strong daytime employment density near the storefront catchment — CBD-adjacent mixed-use corridors. | Bedroom-community metros where daytime population evaporates by 9am and consumption shifts to 6pm dinner-only windows. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Miami at 74.2%) and the #24 city (Minneapolis at 68.4%) is 5.9 percentage points. City-selection impact for Seafood Restaurants is evident in the 0.3-point difference between Miami and Dallas — operators who optimize location stand to gain a meaningful survivability edge.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Seafood Restaurant is 70.3%.
What the Leaders Share
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Seafood Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Miami leads with a 74% average survivability score for Seafood Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Seafood Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Neighborhood diversity: Within each top city, high-survivability zones appear across multiple neighborhood types — from dense urban cores to established suburban strips.
- Consumer demand signals: StreetSpring's data captures foot traffic patterns, competitor review velocity, and demographic fit — all pointing toward sustained demand for Seafood Restaurants in these markets.
StreetSpring's AI models reveal the survivability of businesses in every major U.S. neighborhood, giving agents and entrepreneurs a trusted way to see their future success before opening day. We incorporate data from thousands of neighborhoods and hundreds of thousands of individual businesses. These insights come from StreetSpring's exclusive, in-house forecasting models.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for Argentinian Restaurant
How current is this ranking?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Seafood Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Do Seafood Restaurants only work in top-10 cities?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Seafood Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Seafood Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
Which tools rank cities for a Seafood Restaurant survivability?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Seafood Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Seafood Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Seafood Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which US city has the best survivability for Seafood Restaurants?
Miami ranks as the #1 city in the US for Seafood Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 74%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Miami, a Seafood Restaurant has approximately a 74% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. Dallas ranks second, followed by Tampa Bay. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Reviewed and updated: May 2, 2026 — Bobby Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and foot traffic data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Miami, Dallas, Tampa Bay, Orlando, San Antonio, Portland, Los Angeles, Houston, Phoenix, San Francisco, St Louis, San Diego, New York City, Charlotte, Denver, Washington DC, Baltimore, Chicago, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, Philadelphia, Detroit, Minneapolis.