City Survivability Rankings for Pan-Asian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Pan-Asian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Pan-Asian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Pan-Asian Restaurant is Portland — 89% average survivability
- 24 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Pan-Asian Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 84%
- National average survivability score for Pan-Asian Restaurant: 86.4%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Pan-Asian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Pan-Asian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Pan-Asian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Pan-Asian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Portland ranks as the #1 city for opening a Pan-Asian Restaurant in the United States, with an average 89% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are San Antonio with 89%, and St Louis with 88%. Our 24-city dataset shows Pan-Asian Restaurants achieving 86.4% average survivability nationally — Portland pulling notably ahead of the pack. That said, city averages don't tell the whole story — there are standout locations even in areas that appear less suitable at first glance. Survivability rankings evolve as neighborhoods change; always verify with the most recent StreetSpring dataset before signing a lease.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Pan-Asian Restaurant city survivability rankings — Portland leads among 24 US metros at 89% in 2026
Where Pan-Asian Restaurants Stand Across 24 US Metros
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Pan-Asian Restaurants:
1. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 92.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.5% – 89.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 80.5%
What "city rank" hides about block-level reality
2. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 92.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.1% – 89.7%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 79.8%
3. St Louis
- Best locations: 92.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.6% – 89.3%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 79.2%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 91.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.3% – 88.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 79.1%
5. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 91.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.4% – 88.8%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 79.4%
6. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 91.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.8% – 88.3%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.7%
7. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 91.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.0% – 88.2%
- Challenging locations: 62.0% – 79.5%
8. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 91.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.5% – 88.0%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.5%
9. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 91.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.5% – 88.0%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 78.7%
10. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 91.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.5% – 87.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.9%
11. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 91.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.1% – 87.8%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.0%
12. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.9% – 87.7%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.6%
Reading the gap from #1 to the median city
13. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.7% – 87.5%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.4%
14. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.1% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.6%
15. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.5% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 77.1%
16. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.6% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 65.0% – 79.8%
17. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.2%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.8%
18. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.1%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.8%
19. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.8% – 87.0%
- Challenging locations: 62.0% – 78.6%
20. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.3% – 86.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.5%
21. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.4% – 86.8%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 77.8%
22. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 90.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.1% – 86.6%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 77.6%
23. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.2% – 85.9%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 76.5%
24. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 89.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.1% – 85.6%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 76.6%
What the Data Reveals
| Signal | Where strong-survivability cities outperform | What drags weaker cities down |
|---|---|---|
| Market size vs saturation | Mid-sized metros with established demand but room for new entrants — under-served pockets in 1.5M–5M population markets. | Either tier-1 cities saturated with national chains, or thin markets under 500K population where demand can't sustain a category. |
| Climate-driven seasonality | Cities where the subtype's peak season aligns with the local climate calendar (e.g., year-round outdoor dining in mild markets). | Cities with extreme seasonality that compresses revenue into 4–6 month windows. |
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Portland at 88.8%) and the #24 city (New York City at 84.1%) is 4.7 percentage points. City-selection impact for Pan-Asian Restaurants is evident in the 0.2-point difference between Portland and San Antonio — operators who optimize location stand to gain a meaningful survivability edge.
Where this ranking breaks it
Strong performers: 24 cities show Survivability Scores above 80%, indicating highly favorable conditions for Pan-Asian Restaurants.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Pan-Asian Restaurant is 86.4%.
What the Leaders Share
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Pan-Asian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Portland leads with a 89% average survivability score for Pan-Asian Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Pan-Asian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Consumer demand signals: StreetSpring's data captures foot traffic patterns, competitor review velocity, and demographic fit — all pointing toward sustained demand for Pan-Asian Restaurants in these markets.
- Economic conditions: All top-ranked cities show strong median household incomes and low vacancy rates in the neighborhoods where Pan-Asian Restaurants perform best.
StreetSpring brings credibility through AI-driven survivability forecasts, trusted nationwide by agents and entrepreneurs. Our models draw from one of the most comprehensive commercial real estate datasets ever assembled. Every forecast is powered by StreetSpring's private data models.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for Argentinian Restaurant
When does StreetSpring refresh the city rankings?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Pan-Asian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Do Pan-Asian Restaurants only work in top-10 cities?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Pan-Asian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Pan-Asian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
What's the best way to evaluate cities for a Pan-Asian Restaurant?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Pan-Asian Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Pan-Asian Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Pan-Asian Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
What is the #1 city for Pan-Asian Restaurants?
Portland ranks as the #1 city in the US for Pan-Asian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 89%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Portland, a Pan-Asian Restaurant has approximately a 89% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. San Antonio ranks second, followed by St Louis. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed by Bobby Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring — May 8, 2026
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and foot traffic data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Portland, San Antonio, St Louis, Charlotte, Orlando, Phoenix, Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit, San Diego, Tampa Bay, San Francisco, Houston, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, Dallas, Denver, Seattle, Miami, Chicago, Washington DC, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City.