City Survivability Rankings for Men's Clothing Store
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Men's Clothing Stores across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Men's Clothing Store to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Men's Clothing Store is Dallas — 74% average survivability
- 11 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Men's Clothing Store survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is Philadelphia at 66%
- National average survivability score for Men's Clothing Store: 69.9%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Men's Clothing Stores
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Men's Clothing Store succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Men's Clothing Store?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Men's Clothing Stores?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Dallas ranks as the #1 city for opening a Men's Clothing Store in the United States, with an average 74% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are San Antonio with 74%, and Portland with 73%. The national picture for Men's Clothing Stores shows 69.9% average survivability across 24 cities, with the gap between Dallas and lower-ranked metros revealing significant geographic variation. These averages mask significant neighborhood-by-neighborhood variation; a lower-ranked city can still contain high-potential storefronts. These rankings reflect data through early 2026 — check StreetSpring for the latest figures before any location decision.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Men's Clothing Store city survivability rankings — Dallas leads among 24 US metros at 74% in 2026
The 24-City Survivability Index for Men's Clothing Stores
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Men's Clothing Stores:
1. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 79.1% – 85.0%
- Average locations: 69.7% – 75.5%
- Challenging locations: 37.0% – 63.0%
Where the top 5 cluster, and the surprising outliers
2. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 81.7% – 91.0%
- Average locations: 68.9% – 76.1%
- Challenging locations: 31.0% – 61.1%
3. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 80.3% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 67.5% – 75.0%
- Challenging locations: 26.0% – 59.0%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 80.0% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 68.0% – 74.6%
- Challenging locations: 34.0% – 61.0%
5. St Louis
- Best locations: 80.4% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 67.6% – 74.6%
- Challenging locations: 31.0% – 60.1%
6. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 79.3% – 88.0%
- Average locations: 67.5% – 74.1%
- Challenging locations: 33.0% – 60.5%
7. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 79.1% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 66.5% – 73.2%
- Challenging locations: 33.0% – 59.6%
8. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 79.3% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 65.9% – 72.8%
- Challenging locations: 32.0% – 59.0%
9. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 78.7% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 65.5% – 72.6%
- Challenging locations: 30.0% – 58.2%
10. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 79.1% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 65.6% – 72.5%
- Challenging locations: 32.0% – 58.7%
11. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 78.2% – 88.0%
- Average locations: 65.2% – 72.3%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 57.8%
12. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 78.8% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 65.0% – 72.0%
- Challenging locations: 32.0% – 58.3%
Reading the gap from #1 to the median city
13. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 78.3% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 64.6% – 71.8%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 57.4%
14. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 78.4% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 64.4% – 71.4%
- Challenging locations: 32.0% – 57.8%
15. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 77.9% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 63.9% – 71.2%
- Challenging locations: 28.0% – 56.5%
16. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 77.3% – 88.0%
- Average locations: 63.8% – 70.9%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 56.7%
17. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 78.2% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 63.8% – 71.1%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 56.7%
18. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 77.6% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 63.6% – 70.8%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 56.5%
19. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 78.9% – 92.0%
- Average locations: 63.9% – 71.0%
- Challenging locations: 33.0% – 57.6%
20. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 76.6% – 87.0%
- Average locations: 63.3% – 70.4%
- Challenging locations: 28.0% – 56.1%
21. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 77.9% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 63.5% – 70.6%
- Challenging locations: 31.0% – 56.8%
22. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 77.8% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 63.1% – 70.4%
- Challenging locations: 29.0% – 56.1%
23. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 77.3% – 90.0%
- Average locations: 62.5% – 69.7%
- Challenging locations: 30.0% – 55.9%
24. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 76.2% – 89.0%
- Average locations: 61.7% – 68.6%
- Challenging locations: 32.0% – 55.7%
Top Findings From the City Rankings
| Signal | Where strong-survivability cities outperform | What drags weaker cities down |
|---|---|---|
| Market size vs saturation | Mid-sized metros with established demand but room for new entrants — under-served pockets in 1.5M–5M population markets. | Either tier-1 cities saturated with national chains, or thin markets under 500K population where demand can't sustain a category. |
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
| Daytime vs residential population mix | Cities with strong daytime employment density near the storefront catchment — CBD-adjacent mixed-use corridors. | Bedroom-community metros where daytime population evaporates by 9am and consumption shifts to 6pm dinner-only windows. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Dallas at 74.2%) and the #24 city (Philadelphia at 65.8%) is 8.4 percentage points. The 0.1-point gap between top cities suggests that Men's Clothing Stores viability varies meaningfully across major US metros, though neighborhood-level differences remain significant.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Men's Clothing Store is 69.9%.
What the Leaders Share
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Men's Clothing Stores:
- Strong survivability signals: Dallas leads with a 74% average survivability score for Men's Clothing Stores — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Men's Clothing Stores, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Geographic distribution: The top cities span multiple U.S. regions, giving franchise operators or multi-location owners diverse market options without concentrating risk.
- Low market saturation: Top cities for Men's Clothing Stores have fewer direct competitors per square mile than lower-ranked metros, leaving meaningful whitespace for well-positioned new entrants.
Powered by advanced AI, StreetSpring predicts how businesses will perform in neighborhoods across the country. We incorporate data from thousands of neighborhoods and hundreds of thousands of individual businesses. Every forecast is powered by StreetSpring's private data models.
Visual Data
Related Resources
Related:
- City Survivability Rankings for Acupuncture Clinic
- City Survivability Rankings for Afghan Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for African Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for American Restaurant
- City Survivability Rankings for Argentinian Restaurant
How current is this ranking?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Men's Clothing Stores, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Should a Men's Clothing Store avoid cities ranked below the top 10?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Men's Clothing Stores in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Men's Clothing Stores in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
What's the best way to evaluate cities for a Men's Clothing Store?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Men's Clothing Stores across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Men's Clothing Stores, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Men's Clothing Store will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
What is the #1 city for Men's Clothing Stores?
Dallas ranks as the #1 city in the US for Men's Clothing Stores survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 74%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Dallas, a Men's Clothing Store has approximately a 74% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. San Antonio ranks second, followed by Portland. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: May 5, 2026 by Bobby Koons, StreetSpring founder — updated weekly
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and foot traffic data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Dallas, San Antonio, Portland, Charlotte, St Louis, Orlando, Tampa Bay, Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, San Francisco, Atlanta, Baltimore, Houston, Minneapolis, Washington DC, Boston, Miami, Detroit, Denver, Chicago, Seattle, New York City, Philadelphia.