City Survivability Rankings for Colombian Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Colombian Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Colombian Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- The highest-survivability city for Colombian Restaurant is Portland — 89% average survivability
- 24 of 24 analyzed US metros score above 70% for Colombian Restaurant survivability
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 83%
- National average survivability score for Colombian Restaurant: 86.0%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 24 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Colombian Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Colombian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Colombian Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Colombian Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Portland ranks as the #1 city for opening a Colombian Restaurant in the United States, with an average 89% chance of surviving more than 2 years. Following close behind are San Antonio with 88%, and St Louis with 88%. Across 24 metros, Colombian Restaurants average 86.0% survivability — with 24 cities offering conditions conducive to long-term success in this category. Location-level factors like visibility, foot traffic, and adjacent tenants can override city-level trends in either direction. Market conditions shift frequently — use StreetSpring's live tool to confirm the current picture before committing to a location.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Colombian Restaurant city survivability rankings — Portland leads among 24 US metros at 89% in 2026
All 24 Cities Ranked for Colombian Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 24 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Colombian Restaurants:
1. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- Best locations: 92.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 85.1% – 89.5%
- Challenging locations: 60.0% – 80.0%
What the score range across cities tells you
2. San Antonio Metro: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX
- Best locations: 92.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.8% – 89.4%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 79.3%
3. St Louis
- Best locations: 92.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 84.3% – 89.1%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 78.7%
4. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- Best locations: 91.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.9% – 88.6%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.6%
5. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- Best locations: 91.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.8% – 88.5%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.6%
6. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Best locations: 91.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 87.9%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 78.1%
7. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.5% – 87.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.9%
8. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 87.7%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.2%
9. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- Best locations: 91.2% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.0% – 87.7%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.9%
10. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.9% – 87.5%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 78.0%
11. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- Best locations: 91.0% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.4%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 77.4%
12. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.5% – 87.2%
- Challenging locations: 58.0% – 77.5%
What "city rank" hides about block-level reality
13. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Best locations: 90.9% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.6% – 87.2%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.8%
14. Dallas Metro: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 83.2% – 87.1%
- Challenging locations: 64.0% – 79.3%
15. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- Best locations: 90.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.2% – 87.1%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 76.8%
16. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Best locations: 90.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.0% – 86.9%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 76.7%
17. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- Best locations: 90.7% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.5% – 86.8%
- Challenging locations: 61.0% – 78.1%
18. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 82.3% – 86.8%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 77.5%
19. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Best locations: 90.6% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.9% – 86.7%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.8%
20. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- Best locations: 90.4% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.6% – 86.5%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 76.3%
21. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Best locations: 90.3% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.4% – 86.2%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 76.4%
22. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Best locations: 90.1% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 81.5% – 86.0%
- Challenging locations: 59.0% – 76.9%
23. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- Best locations: 89.8% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.5% – 85.4%
- Challenging locations: 56.0% – 75.5%
24. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- Best locations: 89.5% – 97.0%
- Average locations: 80.1% – 84.9%
- Challenging locations: 57.0% – 75.4%
What Stands Out in the Numbers
| Comparison factor | Top-tier city pattern | Bottom-tier city pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Average commercial rent per sqft | Cities where the median commercial rate fits the subtype's typical revenue-per-sqft envelope (rent < 10% of expected gross). | Cities where rents have outpaced revenue growth, pushing rent-burden ratios past 15%. |
| BLS QCEW retail employment trend | Cities with positive 3-year retail employment growth — proxy for local demand expansion. | Cities showing flat or declining retail employment over the same window. |
| Market size vs saturation | Mid-sized metros with established demand but room for new entrants — under-served pockets in 1.5M–5M population markets. | Either tier-1 cities saturated with national chains, or thin markets under 500K population where demand can't sustain a category. |
Wide variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Portland at 88.5%) and the #24 city (New York City at 83.3%) is 5.2 percentage points. For Colombian Restaurants, a 0.1-point difference between the top two cities underscores how much geographic selection influences long-term viability.
Three findings worth pulling out of the data
Strong performers: 24 cities show Survivability Scores above 80%, indicating highly favorable conditions for Colombian Restaurants.
National average: Across all 24 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Colombian Restaurant is 86.0%.
What's Driving the Strongest Markets
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Colombian Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Portland leads with a 89% average survivability score for Colombian Restaurants — significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Colombian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Foot traffic infrastructure: High-scoring cities combine transit access, walkable commercial corridors, and anchor tenants that drive consistent daily traffic past storefronts.
- Low market saturation: Top cities for Colombian Restaurants have fewer direct competitors per square mile than lower-ranked metros, leaving meaningful whitespace for well-positioned new entrants.
StreetSpring uses AI to predict business survivability across U.S. neighborhoods — trusted by real estate professionals and entrepreneurs nationwide. Our platform has analyzed hundreds of thousands of business outcomes across major U.S. metros. These insights come from StreetSpring's exclusive, in-house forecasting models.
Visual Data
Related Resources
City-specific guides: For detailed neighborhood-level analysis, explore our city guides:
- Business Survivability Rankings: Portland
- Business Survivability Rankings: San Antonio
- Business Survivability Rankings: St Louis
- Business Survivability Rankings: Charlotte
- Business Survivability Rankings: Orlando
National guides:
- National Neighborhood Survivability Rankings for Colombian Restaurants
- Neighborhood Survivability Rankings: Portland
What's the update cadence for this ranking?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates — particularly for Colombian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
What about cities outside the top 10 — can Colombian Restaurants thrive there?
Yes — our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Colombian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Colombian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align — even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
Which tools rank cities for a Colombian Restaurant survivability?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Colombian Restaurants across all 24 metros we track. For this category specifically, the tool surfaces competition density, consumer spending index for Colombian Restaurants, and commercial vacancy rates — the factors that most consistently predict whether a Colombian Restaurant will still be operating after two years. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which metro tops the Colombian Restaurant survivability ranking?
Portland ranks as the #1 city in the US for Colombian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average score of 89%. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Portland, a Colombian Restaurant has approximately a 89% chance of still operating after two years — above the national average for this category. San Antonio ranks second, followed by St Louis. The full ranking reflects data across 24 major US metro areas — see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: April 28, 2026 by Bobby Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and foot traffic data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: City rankings aggregate neighborhood-level Survivability Scores (max, average, and min) across all analyzed neighborhoods in each metro area. Rankings reflect average conditions but do not account for variation within cities. Coverage includes 24 major US metropolitan areas: Portland, San Antonio, St Louis, Charlotte, Orlando, Phoenix, Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit, San Diego, Tampa Bay, San Francisco, Minneapolis, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, Miami, Denver, Seattle, Chicago, Washington DC, Boston, Philadelphia, New York City.